Stratum Market Research
Contact

Consumer ranking

Top 25 suppliers of goods to agriculture projects by World Bank-financed contract value 2026

Asiapac Technology leads with USD 69.8 million in World Bank-financed goods supply contracts in agriculture projects signed from 1 November 2024 to 31 October 2026. The list ranks the 25 companies with the highest total value among 685 companies that won 1,337 such contracts worldwide.

  • MeasureValue of World Bank-financed contracts won
  • PeriodContracts signed 1 November 2024 to 31 October 2026
  • Ranked25 companies
  • Updated10 Nov 2026

Top 10 at a glance

  1. Asiapac Technology69.8 USD million
  2. Karba Otomotiv52.1 USD million
  3. Liebherr18.6 USD million
  4. Hidromek7.3 USD million
  5. Finagrit6.6 USD million
  6. Seha Muhendislik6 USD million
  7. Louis Dreyfus Company5.8 USD million
  8. Jiangxi Weibo Technology4.2 USD million
  9. Vima Serv3.8 USD million
  10. Shenzhen Li's Import and Export Trading3.8 USD million

The full list

RankCompanyHeadquartersValue of World Bank-financed contracts won (USD million)
1Asiapac TechnologySingapore69.8
2Karba OtomotivTurkiye52.1
3LiebherrSwitzerland18.6
4HidromekTurkiye7.3
5FinagritItaly6.6
6Seha MuhendislikTurkiye6
7Louis Dreyfus CompanySwitzerland5.8
8Jiangxi Weibo TechnologyChina4.2
9Vima ServMadagascar3.8
9Shenzhen Li's Import and Export TradingChina3.8
9PeregrineMadagascar3.8
12Grapmicon GlobalNigeria3.5
13Muztaf Global InvestmentNigeria3.4
14Al-Yuma Fertilizer and ChemicalsNigeria3.3
15Jiangxi Tohui Science and Technology GroupChina3.2
16Agro PrecisoNigeria3.1
17FKLBelgium3
18Guangdong Zhongke Import and ExportChina2.9
19Guangzhou Chengyi Import & ExportChina2.3
19Service QuotientNigeria2.3
21Guangzhou Guangdian International TechnologyChina2.2
21Ragaya and Sons NigeriaNigeria2.2
21Dune EngineeringNigeria2.2
24AimexNew Zealand1.9
24Umaham Team EngineeringNigeria1.9

How this list is built

Counted are World Bank-financed goods supply contracts in agriculture projects signed between 1 November 2024 and 31 October 2026 in any borrowing country, where the financing project is classified under agriculture as its only sector, valued at each company's recorded share of the contract in US dollars; contracts with individual consultants, government bodies, universities and research institutes, hospitals, non-profit groups and United Nations or other international agencies are left out. Joint venture contracts are split between the partners as recorded (usually in equal shares), so no contract value is counted twice and each partner is credited with one contract, while contracts recorded only under a consortium name are left out. Subsidiaries and spelling variants are rolled up to one company where the parent group is clear and public (for example China Road and Bridge into China Communications Construction), and ties share a rank.

Every position is set by the data alone, by the same rules for every company. Spotted something to update? Write to info@stratummarketresearch.com with the list and the line, and we correct it within two working days.

For ranked companies: a free badge

Ranked companies can show this badge on their website, in a press release or on LinkedIn at no cost. Pick your company, then copy the code.

Ranking badge preview

Frequently asked questions

Who is number one in the suppliers of goods to agriculture projects on World Bank-financed contracts ranking?

Asiapac Technology ranks first with 69.8 USD million (Contracts signed 1 November 2024 to 31 October 2026).

How is this ranking calculated?

Counted are World Bank-financed goods supply contracts in agriculture projects signed between 1 November 2024 and 31 October 2026 in any borrowing country, where the financing project is classified under agriculture as its only sector, valued at each company's recorded share of the contract in US dollars; contracts with individual consultants, government bodies, universities and research institutes, hospitals, non-profit groups and United Nations or other international agencies are left out. Joint venture contracts are split between the partners as recorded (usually in equal shares), so no contract value is counted twice and each partner is credited with one contract, while contracts recorded only under a consortium name are left out. Subsidiaries and spelling variants are rolled up to one company where the parent group is clear and public (for example China Road and Bridge into China Communications Construction), and ties share a rank.

Can a company pay to rank higher?

Positions come only from the counts described above, and inclusion is free. Every company is ranked by the same rules.

How often is the ranking updated?

Every list is recomputed each quarter from the latest public records, and the update date is printed on the page.

Can a ranked company use the badge?

Yes. Every ranked company can use the free web badge on this page on its website, in press releases and on social media.

Custom research

Looking for a specific market?

Tell us the market, the region and the decision you are making. We reply within one working day with a scope and a date.